Skip to main content

How to get compiler settings for PL/SQL program units

This question was posted today on the OTN SQL-PL/SQL Forum:
Is there a way, after compilation, to detect what level of optimization was used? Perhaps you have something already in production, and you just want to find some candidates for recompile (but not necessarily any changes in the source) with increased optimization level.
The answer is: Yes! Just run a query against the ALL_PLSQL_OBJECT_SETTINGS data dictionary view (or the USER_PLSQL_OBJECT_SETTINGS, to see information only about program units you own).

 For a given schema and object name, the following information is provided through this view:

So suppose you need to identify any program units that may have been accidentally compiled with an optimization level below 2 (the default, aggressive optimization, which can only be improved upon by level 3, which turns on inlining of subprograms globally).

No problem!

SELECT *
  FROM user_plsql_object_settings p
 WHERE p.plsql_optimize_level < 2

Or how about: for which program units has identifier information been gathered for PL/Sscope analysis? 

SELECT *
  FROM user_plsql_object_settings p
 WHERE plscope_settings = 'IDENTIFIERS:ALL'

I offer a LiveSQL script to help you take full, quick advantage of this data dictionary view.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 22, 2016 at 6:44 AM

    Hi Steven,

    is there a way to see how the compiled code looks like, after optimization (level 2 or 3) took place?

    regards
    Sven

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven FeuersteinNovember 23, 2016 at 3:25 AM

      No. This question has come up a lot over the years. First, the compiled code is no longer PL/SQL, so it's value to developers would be pretty limited. In addition, the whole point of automatic optimization is to relieve YOU of the need to pay attention to things like loop invariants. Instead, you concentrate on implementing requirements and writing maintainable code.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE should not be in your application code

A database developer recently came across my  Bulletproof PL/SQL  presentation, which includes this slide. That first item in the list caught his attention: Never put calls to DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE in your application code. So he sent me an email asking why I would say that. Well, I suppose that is the problem with publishing slide decks. All the explanatory verbiage is missing. I suppose maybe I should do a video. :-) But in the meantime, allow me to explain. First, what does DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE do? It writes text out to a buffer, and when your current PL/SQL block terminates, the buffer is displayed on your screen. [Note: there can be more to it than that. For example, you could in your own code call DBMS_OUTPUT.GET_LINE(S) to get the contents of the buffer and do something with it, but I will keep things simple right now.] Second, if I am telling you not to use this built-in, how could text from your program be displayed on your screen? Not without a lot o...
4 comments
Read more

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch, ...
4 comments
Read more

The future of Oracle PL/SQL: some thoughts on Sten Vesterli's thoughts

Sten Vesterli published a very thought-provoking post on his blog: Please stop reading this post, and read that one. When you are done, come on back here for my thoughts on Sten's thoughts. OK. You read it. Here we go. First, thanks, Sten, for being such an interesting, wise, sometimes provocative voice in our community. Next, Sten writes: Now, on the one hand, I certainly agree that the vast majority of young developers are currently caught up in the modern version of a Gold Rush, which is: "Build an app using JavaScript, pay no attention to that database behind the curtain." But I can assure you that I still do meet young PL/SQL programmers, regularly, when I am at conferences and doing onsite presentations at companies. So, young person who writes PL/SQL: do not be afraid! You are not alone! And you are super-smart to have made the choice you did. :-) Next, Sten offers this advice to managers: I agree that PL/SQL is a "spec...
46 comments
Read more