Skip to main content

Results are in for the PL/SQL Challenge Championship for 2019!

Another Oracle Dev Gym championship completed! Find below the rankings for the PL/SQL Challenge Championship for 2019. The number next to the player's name is the number of times that player has participated in a championship. Below the table of results for this championship, you will find another list showing the championship history of each of these players.

Congratulations first and foremost to our top-ranked players:

1st Place: MarkusId

2nd Place: mentzel.iudith

3rd Place: NielsHecker

Next, congratulations to everyone who played in the championship. We hope you found it entertaining, challenging and educational. And for those who were not able to participate in the championship, we will make the championship as a whole available as a workout, so you can take it just like these players did.

Finally, our deepest gratitude to our reviewer, Elic, who has once again performed an invaluable service to our community.

Rank Name Total Time % Correct Total Score
1 MarkusId (1) 28 m 83% 4185
2 mentzel.iudith (6) 37 m 83% 4151
3 NielsHecker (6) 39 m 81% 3940
4 Ivan Blanarik (6) 33 m 78% 3916
5 Stelios Vlasopoulos (6) 39 m 78% 3790
6 Sandra99 (4) 29 m 78% 3781
7 Jan Šerák (6) 36 m 75% 3703
8 Sartograph (3) 39 m 75% 3690
9 mcelaya (5) 36 m 75% 3656
10 PZOL (5) 35 m 75% 3607
11 Maxim Borunov (6) 39 m 72% 3542
12 Andrey Zaytsev (6) 34 m 69% 3462
13 korolkov_d_a (1) 39 m 69% 3442
14 siimkask (6) 21 m 69% 3415
15 li_bao (6) 22 m 67% 3411
16 Michal P. (4) 38 m 69% 3346
17 JeroenR (5) 27 m 67% 3242
18 seanm95 (6) 32 m 64% 3220
19 Mike Tessier (4) 32 m 67% 3219
20 Karel_Prech (6) 39 m 64% 3140
21 Aleksei Davletiarov (2) 38 m 64% 3096
22 Chad Lee (6) 35 m 61% 3056
23 Chase Mei (6) 25 m 61% 3050
24 patch72 (6) 16 m 61% 3033
25 Oleksiy Ponomarenko (4) 10 m 58% 2909
26 lmikhailov (1) 24 m 58% 2852
27 msonkoly (5) 38 m 61% 2847
28 RalfK (2) 09 m 56% 2813
29 Otto Palenicek (4) 34 m 56% 2763
30 Ludovic Szewczyk (3) 16 m 56% 2734
31 NickL (4) 35 m 53% 2659
32 Nikolay Loginov (1) 12 m 50% 2499
33 Rytis Budreika (6) 07 m 47% 2470
34 craig.mcfarlane (1) 37 m 50% 2352
35 swesley_perth (4) 11 m 44% 2203

Championship Performance History

After each name, the quarter in which he or she played, and the ranking in that championship.

Name History
MarkusId 2019:1st
mentzel.iudith 2014:1st, 2015:2nd, 2016:18th, 2017:2nd, 2018:1st, 2019:2nd
NielsHecker 2014:21st, 2015:1st, 2016:15th, 2017:3rd, 2018:6th, 2019:3rd
Ivan Blanarik 2014:16th, 2015:16th, 2017:17th, 2018:4th, 2019:4th
Stelios Vlasopoulos 2014:37th, 2015:19th, 2016:24th, 2017:5th, 2018:14th, 2019:5th
Sandra99 2015:28th, 2017:15th, 2019:6th
Jan Šerák 2014:24th, 2015:8th, 2016:7th, 2017:22nd, 2018:13th, 2019:7th
Sartograph 2017:10th, 2018:31st, 2019:8th
mcelaya 2015:38th, 2016:34th, 2017:29th, 2018:11th, 2019:9th
PZOL 2015:35th, 2017:23rd, 2018:29th, 2019:10th
Maxim Borunov 2015:9th, 2016:17th, 2017:8th, 2018:12th, 2019:11th
Andrey Zaytsev 2014:2nd, 2015:5th, 2016:1st, 2017:21st, 2018:2nd, 2019:12th
korolkov_d_a 2019:13th
siimkask 2014:15th, 2015:14th, 2016:13th, 2017:12th, 2018:19th, 2019:14th
li_bao 2014:36th, 2017:1st, 2019:15th
Michal P. 2015:32nd, 2017:16th, 2019:16th
JeroenR 2014:7th, 2015:20th, 2016:6th, 2018:7th, 2019:17th
seanm95 2014:34th, 2015:4th, 2016:9th, 2017:18th, 2018:17th, 2019:18th
Mike Tessier 2017:33rd, 2018:18th, 2019:19th
Karel_Prech 2014:4th, 2015:6th, 2016:11th, 2017:9th, 2018:5th, 2019:20th
Aleksei Davletiarov 2018:15th, 2019:21st
Chad Lee 2014:13th, 2015:28th, 2016:19th, 2017:7th, 2019:22nd
Chase Mei 2014:25th, 2015:26th, 2016:3rd, 2017:20th, 2018:8th, 2019:23rd
patch72 2014:22nd, 2015:11th, 2017:35th, 2019:24th
Oleksiy Ponomarenko 2016:10th, 2017:4th, 2018:10th, 2019:25th
lmikhailov 2019:26th
msonkoly 2015:15th, 2017:13th, 2018:26th, 2019:27th
RalfK 2018:28th, 2019:28th
Otto Palenicek 2016:29th, 2017:28th, 2018:25th, 2019:29th
Ludovic Szewczyk 2019:30th
NickL 2015:21st, 2018:22nd, 2019:31st
Nikolay Loginov 2019:32nd
Rytis Budreika 2014:18th, 2015:12th, 2016:32nd, 2017:24th, 2019:33rd
craig.mcfarlane 2019:34th
swesley_perth 2016:21st, 2017:32nd, 2019:35th
Labels:

Comments

  1. RASAugust 30, 2020 at 8:17 AM

    Hi , I have a BLOB column in my table , I want to fetch its data through a view. I have used select ..distinct clause in my query , View does not create. it give an datatype error but when i remove distinct keyword it is working fine ..what should I do ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven FeuersteinAugust 30, 2020 at 2:21 PM

      I suggest you rethink the query in your view. Doing a select distinct in the view is a bad idea. Performance, even if you could get it working, will be a problem. Distinct implies sorting and comparison, which we don't do with blobs natively.

      Why do you need to use distinct?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Running out of PGA memory with MULTISET ops? Watch out for DISTINCT!

A PL/SQL team inside Oracle made excellent use of nested tables and MULTISET operators in SQL, blending data in tables with procedurally-generated datasets (nested tables).  All was going well when they hit the dreaded: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2032 bytes  They asked for my help.  The error occurred on this SELECT: SELECT  *    FROM header_tab trx    WHERE (generated_ntab1 SUBMULTISET OF trx.column_ntab)       AND ((trx.column_ntab MULTISET             EXCEPT DISTINCT generated_ntab2) IS EMPTY) The problem is clearly related to the use of those nested tables. Now, there was clearly sufficient PGA for the nested tables themselves. So the problem was in executing the MULTISET-related functionality. We talked for a bit about dropping the use of nested tables and instead doing everything in SQL, to avoid the PGA error. That would, however require lots of work, revamping algorithms, ensuring correctness, you know the score. Then my eyes snagge
4 comments
Read more

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,
4 comments
Read more

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p
24 comments
Read more