Skip to main content

PL/SQL Brain Teaser: How can BULK COLLECT be used?

No sonnets, no songs, just a simple question that has mostly obvious answers, but maybe not completely:

What are the different ways (essentially different kinds of statements) that BULK COLLECT can appear in PL/SQL code?

Comments

  1. Well, out of my head without consulting any manual (but testing in sqlplus first) here they are:

    CLEAR SCREEN
    SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE plch_integer_ntt IS TABLE OF INTEGER;
    /
    -- implicit cursor bulk collect into collection
    DECLARE
    l_coll plch_integer_ntt := plch_integer_ntt ();
    BEGIN
    SELECT LEVEL
    BULK COLLECT INTO l_coll
    FROM DUAL
    CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10;

    FOR f_idx IN 1 .. l_coll.COUNT
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (f_idx || '-' || l_coll (f_idx));
    END LOOP;
    END;
    /
    -- explicit cursor bulk collect into collection
    DECLARE
    l_coll plch_integer_ntt := plch_integer_ntt ();

    CURSOR ten_values_cur
    IS
    SELECT LEVEL val
    FROM DUAL
    CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10;
    BEGIN
    OPEN ten_values_cur;

    FETCH ten_values_cur
    BULK COLLECT INTO l_coll;

    CLOSE ten_values_cur;

    FOR f_idx IN 1 .. l_coll.COUNT
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (f_idx || '-' || l_coll (f_idx));
    END LOOP;
    END;
    /
    -- explicit cursor bulk collect into collection with limits
    DECLARE
    l_coll plch_integer_ntt := plch_integer_ntt ();

    CURSOR ten_values_cur
    IS
    SELECT LEVEL val
    FROM DUAL
    CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 1000;
    BEGIN
    OPEN ten_values_cur;

    LOOP
    FETCH ten_values_cur
    BULK COLLECT INTO l_coll
    LIMIT 100;

    EXIT WHEN l_coll.COUNT = 0;

    FOR f_idx IN 1 .. 10
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (f_idx || '-' || l_coll (f_idx));
    END LOOP;

    exit ; -- exit now for sample purposes
    END LOOP;

    CLOSE ten_values_cur;
    END;
    /

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joao's first example could also be rewritten with:

    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'select level from dual connect by level<=10'
    BULK COLLECT INTO l_coll;

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent, Julius. That's another one!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alos DML returning bulk collect into, like this
    DECLARE
    TYPE number$table IS TABLE OF NUMBER;
    t_ids number$table;
    BEGIN
    DELETE FROM emp WHERE salary > 100 RETURNIG id BULK COLLECT INTO t_ids;
    END;

    ReplyDelete
  5. There you go, Ilya - that was the one I thought would be hardest to recall or be aware of. When you use RETURNING for a DML statement that modifies more than one row, you will need to BULK COLLECT the values returned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steven.
      You wrote: "When you use RETURNING for a DML statement that modifies more than one row, you will need to BULK COLLECT the values returned".
      Another option is to use an aggregate function, like:
      UPDATE T SET... RETURNING SUM(COL1) INTO VAR1;
      Thanks,
      Oren.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for pointing that out, Oren.

      Delete
  6. Hello Steven,

    When I started to write my post, there were still no comments on this thread ...
    now, before I post it, there are already 6 of them, you can really be proud :):)

    So, I will post my comment **before** reading the other ones :)

    In a first quick attempt to cover all the cases, the list seems to be as follows:

    SELECT ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    FETCH ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    UPDATE ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    DELETE ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    FORALL ...
    UPDATE ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    FORALL ...
    DELETE ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    FORALL ...
    INSERT ... VALUES ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    as well as their dynamic counter-parts, like

    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE
    'SELECT ... '
    BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE
    'UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ...'
    RETURNING BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE
    'DELETE ... RETURNING ... INTO ...'
    RETURNING BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    and so on.

    I would just add that, since INSERT SELECT ... RETURNING ... is not supported,
    we should use a properly designed FORALL with a single row insert, like:

    FORALL ...
    INSERT ... VALUES ...
    RETURNING ... BULK COLLECT INTO ...

    as a work-around.

    All the FORALL cases can also use a dynamic statement, like in

    FORALL ...
    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE
    'UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ...'
    USING ...
    RETURNING BULK COLLECT INTO ...


    I hope that I covered all the possible cases but, if not, I am very curious what is it that I forgot.

    Thanks a lot & Best Regards,
    Iudith

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Steven
    Nice explanation, but I have a question regarding 1 piece of code.
    You mentioned the following code in your 2nd program:

    -- explicit cursor bulk collect into collection
    DECLARE
    l_coll plch_integer_ntt := plch_integer_ntt ();

    but I think calling a constructor is not necessary,if you are using bulk collect.
    we can change this something like below:
    l_coll plch_integer_ntt ;--:= plch_integer_ntt ();

    Please correct me if you find me wrong. Thanks

    Regards
    Shu

    ReplyDelete
  8. You are correct, Shu. When populating a collection with BULK COLLECT it is not necessary to initialize or extend first.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kool but any practical use of using bulk collect with returning clause?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I confess that I have not used it in any of my production code (PL/SQL Challenge), but I could see it being handy if I needed to produce a report or log in some way the rows modified and what to.

    Anyone else out there with a use case?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Running out of PGA memory with MULTISET ops? Watch out for DISTINCT!

A PL/SQL team inside Oracle made excellent use of nested tables and MULTISET operators in SQL, blending data in tables with procedurally-generated datasets (nested tables).  All was going well when they hit the dreaded: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2032 bytes  They asked for my help.  The error occurred on this SELECT: SELECT  *    FROM header_tab trx    WHERE (generated_ntab1 SUBMULTISET OF trx.column_ntab)       AND ((trx.column_ntab MULTISET             EXCEPT DISTINCT generated_ntab2) IS EMPTY) The problem is clearly related to the use of those nested tables. Now, there was clearly sufficient PGA for the nested tables themselves. So the problem was in executing the MULTISET-related functionality. We talked for a bit about dropping the use of nested tables and instead doing everything in SQL, to avoid the PGA error. That would, however require lots of work, revamping algorithms, ensuring correctness, you know the score. Then my eyes snagge

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p