Skip to main content

PL/SQL Challenge approaches 1,000,000 answers....how should we celebrate?

Chris Saxon, the PL/SQL Challenge Database Design Quizmaster and Oracle Database Advocate for SQL and member of Ask Tom Answer Team, reminded me yesterday that the number of answers submitted on the PL/SQL Challenge is getting close to 1M.


Now in the, ahem, good old days, when we had a daily PL/SQL quiz, the 1M barrier would be smashed in short order. These days, with our sweep of weekly quizzes, we have a little more time before the earth-shaking event.

So I thought I'd reach out to my pals in the Oracle Database community - PL/SQL Challenge players and otherwise - and see if you had any fun, interesting ideas of how we might celebrate this milestone.

We've got some thoughts, but I'll hold off on sharing those until I hear from you.

Comments

  1. iudithFebruary 6, 2016 at 2:41 AM

    Hello Steven, All,
    This is maybe one of those great moments in life when one should look backward and say: "Yes, indeed, this was a very fruitful period of my life, it gave me a lot and I am really grateful to Steven first of all for having created the PL/SQL Challenge and, then, equally grateful to the entire PL/SQL Challenge community which kept it going: quiz authors, reviewers, players, and, not least, the team which develops, maintains and enhances the pl/sql challenge web site :)".

    What I once suggested in the past and maybe reiterate once again
    was to allow the players specify a little more about themselves,
    first of all, their age, of course, if they are willing to publish it. I was always extremely curious to know who am I competing with.

    Then, it would be nice if the players could take some time and specify a few quizzes that they liked most, along all these years.

    A nice indication in this direction could be produced by using
    the feedback information supplied by players, namely, to extract
    for each player the quizzes that he/she ranked with "5 stars"
    and publish a ranking of those quizzes by the number of votes,
    and possibly, allow us to view the effective list of players
    who voted "5 stars" for each quiz.
    Though feedback information is probably partial, it could however be interesting for those players that "use to compare themselves
    to others", and, I am pretty sure that most players do have their
    own "reference list" of players that they use to followup after ...

    And, if we step over to the realm of dreams ...
    I always dreamed of a great meeting face-to-face of the whole PL/SQL Challenge community ... don't know how, don't know where ...
    This will probably still remain a dream ... but it is so nice to have dreams, when real life offers mostly disappointments ...

    Thanks a lot & Best Regards,
    Iudith

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousAugust 8, 2018 at 4:38 AM

    Hello Iudith, I read this now for the first time. (08-08-2018) I want just to say "I enjoy reading it. It is grate!!

    Warm reagards,
    Hamid Talebian

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p
24 comments
Read more

The differences between deterministic and result cache features

 EVERY once in a while, a developer gets in touch with a question like this: I am confused about the exact difference between deterministic and result_cache. Do they have different application use cases? I have used deterministic feature in many functions which retrieve data from some lookup tables. Is it essential to replace these 'deterministic' key words with 'result_cache'?  So I thought I'd write a post about the differences between these two features. But first, let's make sure we all understand what it means for a function to be  deterministic. From Wikipedia : In computer science, a deterministic algorithm is an algorithm which, given a particular input, will always produce the same output, with the underlying machine always passing through the same sequence of states.  Another way of putting this is that a deterministic subprogram (procedure or function) has no side-effects. If you pass a certain set of arguments for the parameters, you will always get
14 comments
Read more

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,
4 comments
Read more