Skip to main content

Best laid plans or why no new post on table functions this week

I was doing so well: 1 post in my series on table functions each week.

I planned to complete a description of the table function I used in the PL/SQL Challenge rankings report, which I began here.

But then, well, things got in the way. Things like:

  • Write my next article for Oracle Magazine, only one week past due
  • Write five daily tips on PL/SQL via @sfonplsql
  • Produce two new quizzes for the PL/SQL Challenge.
  • Record a video for ODTUG to promote the YesSQL! Day at Kscope15
  • Record a "train the trainer" video to pass on some tips on how to give excellent (or at least highly entertaining) presentations.
  • Donate a small bucket of white cells and plasma to LifeSource.
  • Waaay too many conference call/meetings and waaaaaay too much email.
  • Finish up work on a root canal. Fun!
  • Cut down a bunch of invasive buckthorn (I so love that the sun sets so late in the day now!).
  • Help design and test some exciting new features for Oracle Learning Library
So my apologies, dear readers. Next week. Next week I am certain, I pledge, I promise, I will share you with my amazing table function, filled with a really complicated dynamic SQL query.

In the meantime, have a great weekend!

Comments

  1. iudithMay 1, 2015 at 10:34 AM

    Hello Steven,
    So great to hear that amidst the so many Oracle-related tasks, you still find
    the time for making good to others ... and, maybe, saving someone's life,
    either a human or another being ......
    Anyway, still much better to be in the position of making good to others,
    than, God forbid, fighting desperately to rescue your own life.
    Oracle is beautiful, but it can still "wait in the queue", behind other much more
    important things.
    I am sure that even the most fanatic Oracle-ists will agree with this order
    of priorities, and patiently wait for their turn :):)

    Have a great weekend & Best Regards,
    Iudith

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p
24 comments
Read more

The differences between deterministic and result cache features

 EVERY once in a while, a developer gets in touch with a question like this: I am confused about the exact difference between deterministic and result_cache. Do they have different application use cases? I have used deterministic feature in many functions which retrieve data from some lookup tables. Is it essential to replace these 'deterministic' key words with 'result_cache'?  So I thought I'd write a post about the differences between these two features. But first, let's make sure we all understand what it means for a function to be  deterministic. From Wikipedia : In computer science, a deterministic algorithm is an algorithm which, given a particular input, will always produce the same output, with the underlying machine always passing through the same sequence of states.  Another way of putting this is that a deterministic subprogram (procedure or function) has no side-effects. If you pass a certain set of arguments for the parameters, you will always get
14 comments
Read more

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,
4 comments
Read more