Skip to main content

About the Date Literal in Oracle Database

I offered up a past blog post on Twitter today:



And I saw this reply:
I am unfamiliar with this magical expression: DATE '2016-10-31'. How is this being resolved when it doesn't match the NLS date format?
Which reminded me than many developers are not aware of the date Literal feature of both SQL andPL/SQL. So I figured I should give you all a bit more detail on the topic.

So you are likely familiar with string literals, like 'ABC' and q'[don't need two single quotes]'.  And who isn't aware of using pretty much all the time number literals, like 123 and 2e7?

Relatively few developers know that you can have a date literal, too (and timestamp literal and timestamp with local timezone literal and interval literals).

Literals of these types generally have the form:

TYPE string-literal

where TYPE is the name of the datatype and string-literal is, well, you get the idea. :-)

Here are some examples:

1. Date literal

DATE '2017-08-26'

2. Timestamp literal

TIMESTAMP '2017-08-26 09:26:50.124'

2. Interval literal

INTERVAL '100-4' YEAR(3) TO MONTH

So why does the date literal "work" even if it doesn't match the default date format for my session?

Because the date literal is defined as part of the ANSI SQL standard. It contains no time portion, and must be specified in exactly this format ('YYYY-MM-DD'). Sorry, that's just how it is.

Now that you know about the date literal, you can test your knowledge with a Dev Gym quiz (just search for "date literal").

You can also play around with it easily using this LiveSQL script.
Labels:

Comments

  1. TonyAugust 29, 2017 at 10:59 AM

    I believe there is a typo in your Live SQL script:

    l_holiday DATE := TO_DATE ('2016-01-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD;);

    should probably be

    l_holiday DATE := TO_DATE ('2016-01-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD');

    changing the ";" to a "'" after the DD.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three tips for getting started right with Oracle Database development

By "Oracle Database development", I mean, more or less, writing SQL and PL/SQL. I assume in this post that you have access to Oracle Database (which you can get via Cloud services, Docker , GitHub and OTN ). A. Use a powerful IDE, designed with database programming in mind. There are lots of editors out there, and many IDEs that work with Oracle Database. Sure, you could use Notepad, but OMG the productivity loss. You could also use a popular editor like Sublime, and then it get it working with Oracle. I suggest, however, that you  download  and install Oracle's own own, free, powerful IDE: SQL Developer . If you like to complement your graphical IDE with a command line tool (or OMG if you actually prefer  a command line tool to a graphical interface), you should also check out the relatively new and generating-lots-of-excitement SQLcl . B. Enable compile-time warnings and PL/Scope. The database has tons of useful functionality burned right into it, ready for...
8 comments
Read more

Why DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE should not be in your application code

A database developer recently came across my  Bulletproof PL/SQL  presentation, which includes this slide. That first item in the list caught his attention: Never put calls to DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE in your application code. So he sent me an email asking why I would say that. Well, I suppose that is the problem with publishing slide decks. All the explanatory verbiage is missing. I suppose maybe I should do a video. :-) But in the meantime, allow me to explain. First, what does DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE do? It writes text out to a buffer, and when your current PL/SQL block terminates, the buffer is displayed on your screen. [Note: there can be more to it than that. For example, you could in your own code call DBMS_OUTPUT.GET_LINE(S) to get the contents of the buffer and do something with it, but I will keep things simple right now.] Second, if I am telling you not to use this built-in, how could text from your program be displayed on your screen? Not without a lot o...
4 comments
Read more

The future of Oracle PL/SQL: some thoughts on Sten Vesterli's thoughts

Sten Vesterli published a very thought-provoking post on his blog: Please stop reading this post, and read that one. When you are done, come on back here for my thoughts on Sten's thoughts. OK. You read it. Here we go. First, thanks, Sten, for being such an interesting, wise, sometimes provocative voice in our community. Next, Sten writes: Now, on the one hand, I certainly agree that the vast majority of young developers are currently caught up in the modern version of a Gold Rush, which is: "Build an app using JavaScript, pay no attention to that database behind the curtain." But I can assure you that I still do meet young PL/SQL programmers, regularly, when I am at conferences and doing onsite presentations at companies. So, young person who writes PL/SQL: do not be afraid! You are not alone! And you are super-smart to have made the choice you did. :-) Next, Sten offers this advice to managers: I agree that PL/SQL is a "spec...
46 comments
Read more