Skip to main content

Results of the Dev Gym Logic Championship for 2018

You will find below the rankings for the Logic Annual Championship for quizzes played in 2018. The number next to the player's name is the number of times that player has participated in a championship. Below the table of results for this championship, you will find another list showing the championship history of each of these players.

Congratulations first and foremost to our top-ranked players:

1st Place: Stelios Vlasopoulos

2nd Place: Pavel Zeman

3rd Place: Sartograph 


Next, congratulations to everyone who played in the championship. We hope you found it entertaining, challenging and educational. And for those who were not able to participate in the championship, you can take the quizzes through the Practice feature. We will also make the championship as a whole available as a Test, so you can take it just like these players did.

Finally, many thanks to Eli Feuerstein, the Logic Quizmaster who provided a very challenging set of quizzes, and our deepest gratitude to our reviewers, especially Livio Curzola, who has once again performed an invaluable service to our community.

Rank Name Total Time % Correct Total Score
1 Stelios Vlasopoulos (6) 15 m 100% 4611
2 Pavel Zeman (5) 35 m 100% 4511
3 Sartograph (4) 35 m 100% 4511
4 Sandra99 (6) 37 m 100% 4500
5 seanm95 (6) 52 m 100% 4425
6 Vyacheslav Stepanov (6) 17 m 96% 4414
7 NickL (5) 56 m 100% 4407
8 umir (6) 43 m 92% 4097
9 Köteles Zsolt (5) 44 m 92% 4092
10 richdellheim (6) 59 m 92% 4014
11 mentzel.iudith (6) 34 m 88% 3953
12 craig.mcfarlane (5) 57 m 88% 3835
13 NielsHecker (6) 59 m 88% 3828
14 Talebian (5) 53 m 84% 3668
15 gabt (1) 37 m 80% 3564
16 Tony Winn (4) 48 m 80% 3510
17 Vijay Mahawar (6) 59 m 80% 3450
18 whab@tele2.at (4) 40 m 76% 3360
19 Mike Tessier (4) 44 m 72% 3151
20 Chad Lee (6) 50 m 72% 3123
21 msonkoly (4) 59 m 72% 3075
22 JasonC (6) 34 m 68% 3017
23 Michal P. (2) 56 m 68% 2906
24 Stanislovas (3) 43 m 60% 2594
25 RalfK (5) 59 m 60% 2516
26 Ludovic Szewczyk (2) 59 m 56% 2325
27 Cor van Berkel (5) 44 m 52% 2215
28 Kias (3) 06 m 44% 2028
29 mcelaya (4) 25 m 44% 1937

Championship Performance History

After each name, the quarter in which he or she played, and the ranking in that championship.

Name History
Stelios Vlasopoulos 2013:16th, 2014:29th, 2015:19th, 2016:8th, 2017:1st, 2018:1st
Pavel Zeman 2014:7th, 2015:1st, 2016:3rd, 2017:2nd, 2018:2nd
Sartograph 2015:24th, 2016:21st, 2017:5th, 2018:3rd
Sandra99 2013:17th, 2014:19th, 2015:7th, 2016:4th, 2017:10th, 2018:4th
seanm95 2013:24th, 2014:26th, 2015:33rd, 2016:12th, 2017:22nd, 2018:5th
Vyacheslav Stepanov 2013:1st, 2014:5th, 2015:2nd, 2016:1st, 2017:11th, 2018:6th
NickL 2014:14th, 2015:23rd, 2017:20th, 2018:7th
umir 2016:30th, 2017:12th, 2018:8th
Köteles Zsolt 2014:25th, 2015:4th, 2016:7th, 2017:15th, 2018:9th
richdellheim 2013:31st, 2014:6th, 2015:8th, 2016:13th, 2017:31st, 2018:10th
mentzel.iudith 2013:4th, 2014:18th, 2015:22nd, 2016:6th, 2017:6th, 2018:11th
craig.mcfarlane 2014:8th, 2015:5th, 2017:16th, 2018:12th
NielsHecker 2013:3rd, 2014:21st, 2015:11th, 2016:27th, 2017:19th, 2018:13th
Talebian 2014:10th, 2015:9th, 2018:14th
gabt 2018:15th
Tony Winn 2013:25th, 2016:25th, 2017:7th, 2018:16th
Vijay Mahawar 2015:27th, 2016:24th, 2017:17th, 2018:17th
whab@tele2.at 2015:30th, 2017:33rd, 2018:18th
Mike Tessier 2015:40th, 2016:20th, 2017:4th, 2018:19th
Chad Lee 2013:34th, 2014:31st, 2015:38th, 2016:5th, 2017:8th, 2018:20th
msonkoly 2015:21st, 2017:23rd, 2018:21st
JasonC 2013:35th, 2014:12th, 2015:26th, 2016:2nd, 2017:9th, 2018:22nd
Michal P. 2017:24th, 2018:23rd
Stanislovas 2016:31st, 2017:26th, 2018:24th
RalfK 2015:20th, 2016:15th, 2017:13th, 2018:25th
Ludovic Szewczyk 2018:26th
Cor van Berkel 2014:36th, 2015:17th, 2018:27th
Kias 2017:30th, 2018:28th
mcelaya 2015:25th, 2017:32nd, 2018:29th

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three tips for getting started right with Oracle Database development

By "Oracle Database development", I mean, more or less, writing SQL and PL/SQL. I assume in this post that you have access to Oracle Database (which you can get via Cloud services, Docker , GitHub and OTN ). A. Use a powerful IDE, designed with database programming in mind. There are lots of editors out there, and many IDEs that work with Oracle Database. Sure, you could use Notepad, but OMG the productivity loss. You could also use a popular editor like Sublime, and then it get it working with Oracle. I suggest, however, that you  download  and install Oracle's own own, free, powerful IDE: SQL Developer . If you like to complement your graphical IDE with a command line tool (or OMG if you actually prefer  a command line tool to a graphical interface), you should also check out the relatively new and generating-lots-of-excitement SQLcl . B. Enable compile-time warnings and PL/Scope. The database has tons of useful functionality burned right into it, ready for...

Why DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE should not be in your application code

A database developer recently came across my  Bulletproof PL/SQL  presentation, which includes this slide. That first item in the list caught his attention: Never put calls to DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE in your application code. So he sent me an email asking why I would say that. Well, I suppose that is the problem with publishing slide decks. All the explanatory verbiage is missing. I suppose maybe I should do a video. :-) But in the meantime, allow me to explain. First, what does DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE do? It writes text out to a buffer, and when your current PL/SQL block terminates, the buffer is displayed on your screen. [Note: there can be more to it than that. For example, you could in your own code call DBMS_OUTPUT.GET_LINE(S) to get the contents of the buffer and do something with it, but I will keep things simple right now.] Second, if I am telling you not to use this built-in, how could text from your program be displayed on your screen? Not without a lot o...

The future of Oracle PL/SQL: some thoughts on Sten Vesterli's thoughts

Sten Vesterli published a very thought-provoking post on his blog: Please stop reading this post, and read that one. When you are done, come on back here for my thoughts on Sten's thoughts. OK. You read it. Here we go. First, thanks, Sten, for being such an interesting, wise, sometimes provocative voice in our community. Next, Sten writes: Now, on the one hand, I certainly agree that the vast majority of young developers are currently caught up in the modern version of a Gold Rush, which is: "Build an app using JavaScript, pay no attention to that database behind the curtain." But I can assure you that I still do meet young PL/SQL programmers, regularly, when I am at conferences and doing onsite presentations at companies. So, young person who writes PL/SQL: do not be afraid! You are not alone! And you are super-smart to have made the choice you did. :-) Next, Sten offers this advice to managers: I agree that PL/SQL is a "spec...