Skip to main content

Viewing conditionally compiled code: what will be run?

2nd in a series on conditional compilation. See end of post for links to all posts in the series.

In the previous (first) post in my series on conditional compilation, I covered use cases and presented some simple examples.

In this post, I show you how you can confirm what code is actually going to be executed after compilation. Without conditional compilation, this is of course a silly exercise. The code that is executed is the same as the code you see in your editor.

But with conditional compilation, the code that is compiled and therefore runs could depend on any of the following:
  • The version of the database in which it is compiled
  • The values of user-defined conditional compilation flags
  • The values of pre-defined (system) conditional compilation flags, like $$plsq1_optimize_level
It can be a little bit nerve-wracking for a developer to not be entirely sure what is going to execute, so we provide the DBMS_PREPROCESSOR package, with its two subprograms:
  • print_post_processed_source - display the post-processed code on your screen
  • get_post_processed_source - return the post-processed code as an array.
If you are wondering why the name of the package contains "preprocessor" but its only subprograms contain "post_processed"....well, what's life without a mystery or two? :-)

The "print" procedure has three overloadings:

1. Prints post-processed source text of a stored PL/SQL unit:

DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.PRINT_POST_PROCESSED_SOURCE (
   object_type    IN VARCHAR2,
   schema_name    IN VARCHAR2,
   object_name    IN VARCHAR2);

2. Prints post-processed source text of a compilation unit:

DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.PRINT_POST_PROCESSED_SOURCE (
   source IN VARCHAR2);
 
3. Prints post-processed source text of an INDEX-BY table containing the source text of the compilation unit:

DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.PRINT_POST_PROCESSED_SOURCE (
   source IN source_lines_t);

Let's try it out. My optimization level is set to the default: 2. I execute these statements:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE post_processed
IS
BEGIN
   $IF $$plsql_optimize_level = 1
   $THEN
      -- Slow and problematic
      NULL;
   $ELSE
      -- Fast and modern and easy
      NULL;
   $END
END post_processed;
/

BEGIN
   DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.print_post_processed_source (
      'PROCEDURE',
      SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'current_schema'),
      'POST_PROCESSED');
END;
/
and I see this output:
PROCEDURE post_processed
IS
BEGIN
   




      -- Fast and modern and easy
      NULL;
   
END post_processed;
I then set the optimization level to 1 for this procedure as I recompile it:
ALTER PROCEDURE post_processed COMPILE plsql_optimize_level=1
/
The output then changes as follows:
BEGIN
   DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.print_post_processed_source (
      'PROCEDURE',
      SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'current_schema'),
      'POST_PROCESSED');
END;
/

PROCEDURE post_processed
IS
BEGIN
   

      -- Slow and problematic
      NULL;
   



END post_processed;
Take a close and careful look at these two sets of output. Notice how carefully the white space (vertical - lines, and horizontal - spaces) is preserved. This is critical.

This is the code that will be executed. So PL/SQL needs to make sure that if an exception is raised and error stack or back trace is displayed/logged, the line and column numbers in those messages reflect what you see in your original source code, namely:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE post_processed
IS
BEGIN
   $IF $$plsql_optimize_level = 1
   $THEN
      -- Slow and problematic
      NULL;
   $ELSE
      -- Fast and modern and easy
      NULL;
   $END
END post_processed;
I hope you can see that is, in fact, the case.

I could show you examples of calling the other overloadings of the print procedure, but I think you get the idea. Here's essentially the same behavior as the print procedure, but using the get function instead - and encapsulate into my very own procedure, adding line numbers:
CREATE PROCEDURE show_code_for (tp IN VARCHAR2, nm IN VARCHAR2)
IS
   l_postproc_code   DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.source_lines_t;
   l_row             PLS_INTEGER;
BEGIN
   l_postproc_code :=
      DBMS_PREPROCESSOR.get_post_processed_source (
         tp,
         SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'current_schema'),
         nm);
   l_row := l_postproc_code.FIRST;

   WHILE (l_row IS NOT NULL)
   LOOP
      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (
            LPAD (l_row, 3)
         || ' - '
         || RTRIM (l_postproc_code (l_row), CHR (10)));
      l_row := l_postproc_code.NEXT (l_row);
   END LOOP;
END;
/
and I put it to use:
BEGIN
   show_code_for ('PROCEDURE', 'POST_PROCESSED');
END;
/

  1 - PROCEDURE post_processed
  2 - IS
  3 - BEGIN
  4 -    
  5 - 
  6 -       -- Slow and problematic
  7 -       NULL;
  8 -    
  9 - 
 10 - 
 11 - 
 12 - END post_processed;
I hope you find this helpful.

Resources

Comprehensive white paper: a great starting place - and required reading - for anyone planning on using conditional compilation in production code

Conditional compilation scripts on LiveSQL

Tim Hall (Oracle-BASE) coverage of conditional compilation

Conditional compilation documentation

My Oracle Magazine article on this topic

Conditional Compilation Series
1. An introduction to conditional compilation
2. Viewing conditionally compiled code: what will be run?
3. Writing code to support multiple versions of Oracle Database
4. Setting and using your own conditional compilation flags
5. How to make sure your code FAILS to compile

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Running out of PGA memory with MULTISET ops? Watch out for DISTINCT!

A PL/SQL team inside Oracle made excellent use of nested tables and MULTISET operators in SQL, blending data in tables with procedurally-generated datasets (nested tables).  All was going well when they hit the dreaded: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2032 bytes  They asked for my help.  The error occurred on this SELECT: SELECT  *    FROM header_tab trx    WHERE (generated_ntab1 SUBMULTISET OF trx.column_ntab)       AND ((trx.column_ntab MULTISET             EXCEPT DISTINCT generated_ntab2) IS EMPTY) The problem is clearly related to the use of those nested tables. Now, there was clearly sufficient PGA for the nested tables themselves. So the problem was in executing the MULTISET-related functionality. We talked for a bit about dropping the use of nested tables and instead doing everything in SQL, to avoid the PGA error. That would, however require lots of work, revamping algorithms, ensuring correctness, you know the score. Then my eyes snagge

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p